Appropriating the past for the purposes of the present is at the heart of historical writing and forms an important component in generating skepticism toward the hermeneutics of history as a discipline. However, often times attempts to recover a desirable, usable history encounter difficulties, even insurmountable problems. These cases of failure present an interesting alternative narrative to those in which that past is selectively, triumphantly (and at times, elegantly) reconstructed to speak to the needs of the present. This paper explores how Turkish historians have wrestled with Ottoman intellectual history via an early modern symposium on the role of philosophy in Islamic thought. This event has been viewed by nationalist historians as a turning point in which the Ottomans rejected philosophical thought and adopted an non-rational orientation toward knowledge acquisition and production. For many interpreters, decline begins at this moment in history. Attempts to revise this narrative by historians favorably disposed to the Ottomans have encountered difficulties re-interpreting the event and Ottoman scholarly life in general as intellectually vibrant. Expecting to find geniuses and signs of rapid innovation, both nationalists and revisions approach Ottoman history with skewed assumptions that fail to assess Ottoman accomplishments on their own terms.
Wednesday, September 21, 2016, 5:30 pm